| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mikko Partio <mpartio(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)livedatagroup(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
| Date: | 2007-08-31 19:48:43 |
| Message-ID: | 815.1188589723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's worth noting that the patch Florian is working on, to suppress
>> assignment of XIDs for transactions that never write anything, will make
>> for a large reduction in the rate of XID consumption in many real-world
>> applications.
> Off topic and just out of curiousity, is this the work that will
> allow standby servers to have selects run on them without stopping
> WAL replay?
It's a small component of that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-31 23:24:56 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-08-31 19:36:37 | Re: [Solved] Postgres performance problem |