Re: esql vs libpq

From: svcntk <svcntk(at)HotPOP(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: esql vs libpq
Date: 2009-12-30 08:59:20
Message-ID: 81141d450912300059x703ea861h68f513b8f081ed21@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

ESQL = ECPG (Embedded SQL in C)

Thanks

2009/12/30 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:
> svcntk wrote:
>> I'm doing a comparison between ESQL interfaces and libpq. For libp I
>> use pgbench, based on TCP-C, while for ESQL have a program that also
>> follows the transactions carried out on TCP-C.
>>
>> However, the result with libpq is much better, with about 700
>> transactions per second, whereas with ESQL does not reach the figure
>> of 400. Does anyone know if libpq has superior performance to ESQL, or
>> is there something I am not taking into account?
>
> What is ESQL?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicola Farina 2009-12-30 10:35:55 Out of memory problem
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2009-12-30 08:32:18 Re: esql vs libpq