| From: | chester c young <chestercyoung(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Cc: | sql pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: apparent RI bug |
| Date: | 2008-04-03 20:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 811324.18014.qm@web54305.mail.re2.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
> Is it possible you ever had a before delete trigger that just did a
> return
> NULL rather than raising an exception? IIRC, explicitly telling the
> system to ignore the delete will work on the referential actions.
yes, it is possible, for example, a function without a body or without
a "return old".
are you saying this would override the RI constraint? if so, is this
by design?
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2008-04-03 20:35:15 | Re: apparent RI bug |
| Previous Message | Marcin Krawczyk | 2008-04-03 19:26:52 | Re: connections between servers |