Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The above scenario is only a risk if you suppose that dropping a
>> relation that lacks physical storage will nonetheless result in
>> attempted unlink()s. I think that that's probably not the case;
> Why? How would we know that it didn't have physical storage prior to
> attempting the unlinks?
From the relkind.
regards, tom lane