From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.) |
Date: | 2001-05-08 20:35:26 |
Message-ID: | 8106.989354126@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The query that showed the bug would serve just fine.
Most of the bug reports we get are far too bulky to be appropriate to
add to the regress tests as-is. IMHO anyway.
We do need more extensive regress tests, but I don't think that slapping
bug-report samples into them is the right way to get there ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql-bugs | 2001-05-09 12:54:03 | PostgreSQL 7.1.1: Backend crash when calling plpgsql function |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-08 20:17:56 | New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-05-08 21:14:46 | Re: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bugwith pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-08 20:17:56 | New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.) |