Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock

From: "Kevin Rocker" <me(at)kevinrocker(dot)com>
To: "Andrey Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Neil Chen" <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers mailing list" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock
Date: 2026-08-24 20:00:57
Message-ID: 80e57af0-68f2-4c2e-b1bc-79317bfb0735@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

That sounds like a good plan to me, backpatch 0001 with the actual fixes and keep 0002 with the assert on master .

v7 is identical to v6 except with typos fixed.

- Kevin Rocker

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Move-interrupt-checks-out-of-locked-regions.patch text/x-patch 4.5 KB
v7-0002-Assert-that-vacuum_delay_point-is-called-only-whe.patch text/x-patch 1.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alberto Piai 2026-08-24 20:03:16 Re: Adding a stored generated column without long-lived locks
Previous Message Tristan Partin 2026-08-24 19:39:48 Re: Add a Nix flake