Re: Add sortsupport to money_ops, pg_lsn_ops and xid8_ops

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add sortsupport to money_ops, pg_lsn_ops and xid8_ops
Date: 2026-11-06 16:53:05
Message-ID: 80E7FFDA-CF8D-48CC-9E68-BB73C25E98BB@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 6 Nov 2026, at 21:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Is it really worth the development and ongoing maintenance costs
> to carry such code? I doubt many users are doing large sorts on
> columns of these data types.

I've definitely seen people sort moneys.
But IMO, the patch is more about feature alignment than practical benefit.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manu 2026-11-06 17:01:20 Re: O(N^3) planning time in choose_plan_name() since 8c49a484e8e
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-11-06 16:44:19 Re: Avoid truncated or zero-padded copies of replaced files in backups.