Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Date: 2021-08-24 14:42:49
Message-ID: 80C4332E-1FF6-46F2-8326-A10547A5693E@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Aug 23, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Patch v5-0011 is a bug fix posted elsewhere that hasn't been committed yet but which must be committed in preparation for v5-0012.
>
> No idea what it is as I hadn't looked yet, but if it's a bug fix then
> shouldn't it be separated and back-patched..?

It is already a patch waiting for commit.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1F238937-7CC2-4703-A1B1-6DC225B8978A%40enterprisedb.com


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-08-24 15:18:04 Re: Gather performance analysis
Previous Message Denis Laxalde 2021-08-24 14:40:02 Re: [PATCH] Disable bgworkers during servers start in pg_upgrade