From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
Date: | 2021-08-24 14:42:49 |
Message-ID: | 80C4332E-1FF6-46F2-8326-A10547A5693E@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Aug 23, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Patch v5-0011 is a bug fix posted elsewhere that hasn't been committed yet but which must be committed in preparation for v5-0012.
>
> No idea what it is as I hadn't looked yet, but if it's a bug fix then
> shouldn't it be separated and back-patched..?
It is already a patch waiting for commit.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1F238937-7CC2-4703-A1B1-6DC225B8978A%40enterprisedb.com
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-24 15:18:04 | Re: Gather performance analysis |
Previous Message | Denis Laxalde | 2021-08-24 14:40:02 | Re: [PATCH] Disable bgworkers during servers start in pg_upgrade |