Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Howard Cole <howard(dot)cole(at)selestial(dot)com>, "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison
Date: 2005-03-08 17:09:42
Message-ID: 8030.1110301782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
> However, Fedora Core 2 still includes MySQL V 3.xx.yy because of the
> issues wth V4.xx.yy's licensing. However, Suse does include the latest
> version. So there's some difference of opinion on the issue from
> different distros.

Not any more --- it's just that Red Hat's legal department wouldn't
sign off on the deal until after FC3 was released. RHEL4, FC4 and
up contain MySQL 4.x.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Casey 2005-03-08 17:11:25 Re: postgresql vs mysql performance comparison
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-03-08 16:46:38 Re: Move cursor