| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ameet Kini <akini(at)cs(dot)wisc(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql performance tuning |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 18:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 8026.1133892226@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ameet Kini <akini(at)cs(dot)wisc(dot)edu> writes:
> I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
> vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
> of my tables. However, its noted in the docs (e.g.
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/routine-reindex.html)
> and on the lists here that indexes may still bloat after a while and hence
> reindex is necessary. How often do people reindex their tables out
> there?
Never, unless you have actual evidence that your indexes are bloating.
It's only very specific use-patterns that have problems.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Riess | 2005-12-06 18:28:44 | Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-06 18:02:12 | Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene |