Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
Date: 2003-11-29 18:07:23
Message-ID: 8004.1070129243@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> writes:
> The project lead for the Aurora SPARC Linux project is who recommended it in
> the first place;

We were told equally positively, by equally well-informed persons, that
we should prefer -fpic if at all possible.

The best I have been able to tell is that none of our .so's are anywhere
near large enough to require -fPIC. In the absence of any evidence that
we really are near the threshold, I'd prefer to go for the
better-performing alternative.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-29 18:12:58 Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-29 17:43:25 Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC