Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?

From: les(at)Mars(dot)mcs(dot)net (Leslie Mikesell)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Date: 1999-09-21 02:59:26
Message-ID: 7s6sae$2evg$1@Mars.mcs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In article <199909201327(dot)JAA18590(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> > I am told we are the same as Ingres, and slower than Oracle with no -F,
>> > and faster than Oracle with -F.
>>
>> What is "-F"?
>>
>
>-F is postgres option for no-fsync.

Does that matter on read-only selects?

Might some future version of postgresql have an option to turn
off transaction support to match mysql speed for the situations
where that is more important than the ability to roll back?

Les Mikesell
les(at)mcs(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-09-21 04:26:40 postmaster disappears
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-21 02:47:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2