Re: Trying out <stdatomic.h>

On Thursday, October 22nd, 2026 at 9:17 PM, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
> I did some fuzz testing using Opus today and did not find anything.
>
> I also did some manual experiments and I think everything is working fine in
> mac.
>
> V10 looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Shihao

Hi Shihao,

Thank you for the testing, and for the three real bugs you found along
the way. I've added you as Reviewed-by.

v11 attached, rebased on master (1910daf9831). The code is unchanged
from v10; this round only corrects the commit messages, which had
drifted from the code (they still mentioned pg_atomic_uint8/16, which
were removed earlier, a test_atomics module that no longer exists, and
a pg_atomic_flag-based spinlock, when slock_t is a pg_atomic_uint32).

As before, 0003 is named .patch_ so cfbot tests 0001 and 0002 only.

best.

-greg