Re: Backup Strategy Second Opinion

From: Bryan Murphy <bmurphy1976(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup Strategy Second Opinion
Date: 2009-02-23 01:56:55
Message-ID: 7fd310d10902221756uace8b4ao177c11d8ecc55203@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 1. It's OK if we lose a few seconds (or even minutes) of transactions
>> should one of our primary databases crash.
>> 2. It's unlikely we'll need to load a backup that's more than a few days
>> old.
>
> How do you handle failover and falling back to the primary once it's up?

We don't plan to fail back to the primary. Amazon is a very different
beast, once a server is dead, we just toss it away. The secondary
permanently becomes the primary and we create a new tertiary from
scratch which then becomes a log shipped copy of the secondary.

Bryan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Uckun 2009-02-23 04:16:18 Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD
Previous Message Tim Uckun 2009-02-23 01:30:08 Re: Backup Strategy Second Opinion