| From: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com" <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |
| Date: | 2021-07-21 16:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | 7f99890b3e5aecdf903ea2e0f4d445d9fcaf0999.camel@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 00:08 +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 13:13 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > That could be adapted; the question is if the approach as such is
> > desirable or not. This is necessarily a moving target, at the rate
> > that emojis are created and added to Unicode.
>
> Sure. We already have code in the tree that deals with that moving
> target, though, by parsing apart pieces of the Unicode database. So the
> added maintenance cost should be pretty low.
(I am working on such a patch today and will report back.)
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-07-21 16:11:49 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-07-21 15:58:02 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |