Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations
Date: 2018-01-23 17:08:37
Message-ID: 7f7f48c1-3ce7-ff3d-5d0a-bd965cb13095@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/22/18 02:29, Michael Paquier wrote:
> However there is as well the argument that this list's contents are not
> directly used now, and based on what I saw from the MacOS SSL and GnuTLS
> patches that would not be the case after either.

Right, there is no facility for negotiating the channel binding type, so
a boolean result should be enough.

In which case we wouldn't actually need this for GnuTLS yet.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2018-01-23 17:13:09 Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-23 17:06:29 Re: Test-cases for exclusion constraints is missing in alter_table.sql file