Re: Built-in connection pooler

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooler
Date: 2019-07-26 16:27:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I attached a patch to apply after your latest patch [2] with my
> suggested changes to the docs.  I tried to make things read smoother
> without altering your meaning.  I don't think the connection pooler
> chapter fits in The SQL Language section, it seems more like Server
> Admin functionality so I moved it to follow the chapter on HA, load
> balancing and replication.  That made more sense to me looking at the
> overall ToC of the docs.
Thank you.
I have committed your documentation changes in my Git repository and
attach new patch with your corrections.

Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
builtin_connection_proxy-12.patch text/x-patch 130.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Liudmila Mantrova 2019-07-26 17:43:40 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2019-07-26 16:26:28 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs