Re: identity columns

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: identity columns
Date: 2017-04-18 15:51:50
Message-ID: 7e8fafb2-1949-fd97-cb57-fb1a3fe0ed6e@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/17 01:26, Vitaly Burovoy wrote:
> I've implement SET GENERATED ... IF NOT EXISTS. It must be placed
> before other SET options but fortunately it conforms with the
> standard.
> Since that form always changes the sequence behind the column, I
> decided to explicitly write "[NO] CACHE" in pg_dump.
>
> As a plus now it is possible to rename the sequence behind the column
> by specifying SEQUENCE NAME in SET GENERATED.
>
> I hope it is still possible to get rid of the "ADD GENERATED" syntax.

I am still not fond of this change. There is precedent all over the
place for having separate commands for creating a structure, changing a
structure, and removing a structure. I don't understand what the
problem with that is.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-18 15:53:36 Re: identity columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-18 15:48:07 Re: Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check