Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more
Date: 2016-09-15 20:00:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/15/2016 05:33 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Paquier 2016-09-15 <CAB7nPqQu1GpMzkB4S6XO0_+1cAUx==RDVF70vCmDytuA=nCHiQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>>> I backpatched this to 9.5, but not further than that. The functions this
>>> modified were moved around in 9.5, so the patch wouldn't apply as is. It
>>> wouldn't be difficult to back-patch further if there's demand, but I'm not
>>> eager to do that until someone complains.
>> Not going older than 9.5 may be fine:
>> As far as I can see 1.0.2 would be supported until Dec 2019, so that
>> would just overlap with 9.4's EOL.
> I'm afraid it's not that easy - Debian 9 (stretch) will release at the
> beginning of next year, and will want to build
> 9.2/9.3/9.4 for that distribution. I guess will
> have the same problem with the next Fedora release.

Can you elaborate? Are you saying that Debian 9 (strect) will not ship
OpenSSL 1.0.2 anymore, and will require using OpenSSL 1.1.0?

- Heikki

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-15 20:24:07 Re: PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-15 19:59:25 Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11