Re: pgindent vs. pgperltidy command-line arguments

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent vs. pgperltidy command-line arguments
Date: 2023-06-21 14:36:06
Message-ID: 7dc13980-318c-c52b-3657-099433e8b0f5@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.06.23 13:35, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> If not, part of my patch would still be useful.  Maybe I should commit
>> my posted patch for PG16, to keep consistency with pgindent, and then
>> your work would presumably be considered for PG17.
>
> That sounds like a good plan.

done

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2023-06-21 14:41:33 Re: Allow pg_archivecleanup to remove backup history files
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-06-21 14:22:47 Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation