From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ertan Küçükoglu <ertan(dot)kucukoglu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Domains vs data types |
Date: | 2025-08-20 15:05:44 |
Message-ID: | 7cdd7a73-5a61-451b-9556-5cb523cfb239@aklaver.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/19/25 21:47, Ertan Küçükoglu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using PostgreSQL 17.6.
> I would like to learn if there is any benefit of using domains over data
> types for table column definitions in terms of performance gain/loss.
>
> For example I might have table defined as below
> create table test (
> a integer,
> b integer,
> c integer,
> d varchar(5)
> );
>
> I might also have ame table defined as below
>
> create domain aint integer;
> create domain s5 varchar(5);
>
> create table test_domain (
> a aint,
> b aint,
> c aint,
> d s5
> );
>
> Does the second table have any technical advantage/disadvantage over
> plain data type definition?
> Less metadata in memory? High metadata in memory? Less/increased disk space?
See:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-type.html
for what is stored in system catalog for a domain vs a base type.
Personally I don't see that integer --> aint really helps.
Also I am pretty sure varchar(5) --> s5 is still going to result in a
length check.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ertan
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-08-20 15:14:47 | Re: Streaming replica hangs periodically for ~ 1 second - how to diagnose/debug |
Previous Message | Scot Kreienkamp | 2025-08-20 14:59:17 | RE: Streaming replica hangs periodically for ~ 1 second - how to diagnose/debug |