Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Valery Popov <v(dot)popov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Date: 2016-09-28 13:34:47
Message-ID: 7c95050a-d391-9ffc-f364-84c6a7eb0700@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/28/16 5:25 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> Once we get the main SCRAM patch in, we may want to remove the "on"
> alias altogether. We don't promise backwards-compatibility of config
> files or GUC values, and not many people set password_encryption=on
> explicitly anyway, since it's the default.

+1.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-28 14:03:05 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-28 13:33:06 Re: Python3.4 detection on 9.6 configuration