Re: archiving binary releases

From: "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: archiving binary releases
Date: 2009-01-10 14:24:01
Message-ID: 7be3f35d0901100624g16a1099dh809d7b24ab2a7827@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Marc,

> I'm going to clean out the binary archives, unless someone has a really
> compelling reason why we need to keep binaries from 7.0? Or why we need to
> keep RC / Beta binaries?
>
> My thought was to keep the last version on each branch, up until what we
> officially support, and get rid of the 'interum releases' (ie. v8.3RC1) ...

I see one very, very compelling reason:
- crash on old machine running any of that releases. The installation
of PostgreSQL gets trashed by something (wild running virus i.e.)

To access the files within pg_data you need the binaries of that
version. In that stress situation (crash, virus, trashed program
files) you are not really eager to compile PostgreSQL.

So I recommend to keep those binaries. Storage is cheap.

Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
no fx, no carrier pigeon
-
EuroPython 2009 will take place in Birmingham - Stay tuned!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-10 17:41:42 Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2009-01-10 14:16:20 archiving binary releases