| From: | "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mischa Sandberg" <mischas(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tuning |
| Date: | 2007-02-06 10:21:41 |
| Message-ID: | 7be3f35d0702060221o46599dc3ua8a6ac6802b94fe0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tuners,
allways be aware that results on Windows may be totally different!
My main customer is running PostgreSQL 8.1 on MINIMUM shared buffers
max_connections = 100 #
shared_buffers = 200 # min 16 or max_connections*2, 8KB each
I changed it to this value from the very low default 20000, and the system
is responding better; especially after fixing the available memory setting
within the planner.
... frustrating part is, I could not replicate this behavious with pg_bench
:(
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
fx 01212-5-13695179
-
Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-02-06 12:58:29 | Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query (example and benchmark) |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2007-02-06 09:33:56 | Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? |