Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

From: "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date: 2007-01-27 17:14:47
Message-ID: 7be3f35d0701270914k5810f78asa46826c4fbeaa1de@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> a feeling I have). But the important part is that either way I think
> it's way too early to drop 8.1.
>

I agree. Started a project last summer, using 8.1, rollout is now. > 1 year
for database projects is not unusual, and having the database release
dropped during this time is not nice.

Harald

--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
fx 01212-5-13695179
-
Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Haile 2007-01-27 17:34:51 Re: Stats collector frozen?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-27 16:48:32 Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches