Re: Function to track shmem reinit time

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function to track shmem reinit time
Date: 2018-03-29 13:40:03
Message-ID: 7baab5cb-5446-8f25-024d-73bb381695e4@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/28/2018 08:55 PM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/4/18 11:17 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>> Furthermore, the patch is yet another victim of fd1a421fe - fixing the
>> pg_proc entries is trivial, but a new version is needed.
>>
>> I'd also like to see an example/explanation how this improves this
>> situation compared to only having pg_postmaster_start_time.
>>
>> So I'm setting this as waiting on author for now.
>
> I'm not sure why this was set back to Needs Review since it neither
> applies cleanly nor builds.
>

It likely applied/built fine when it was set to NR, but got broken by
some recent commit.

> I'm setting this entry to Waiting on Author, but based on the discussion
> I think it should be Returned with Feedback.
>

Fine with me.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-29 13:42:19 Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-29 13:36:09 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists