From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
Date: | 2017-02-22 05:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 7b94f406-0cc0-20d6-f6e8-e677e6e8adb2@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/21/17 4:52 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> TL> The question to be asked is whether there is still anybody out there
> TL> using float timestamps.
>
> Gentoo's ebuild includes:
>
> $(use_enable !pg_legacytimestamp integer-datetimes) \
FWIW, last time I looked it was also an option in FreeBSD's ports,
though I think it's defaulted to int since forever ago (like, 7.4 era).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-02-22 06:10:35 | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-02-22 05:55:53 | Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering? |