Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karen Huddleston <khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Date: 2017-06-15 05:59:21
Message-ID: 7b174b7a-4c94-f785-5c92-70bfc3a6d1db@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
> documentation?

I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been
deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone.
Would be one less hack to maintain.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-15 06:05:01 Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-15 04:53:54 Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types