Re: recent failures on lorikeet

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recent failures on lorikeet
Date: 2021-06-14 16:41:36
Message-ID: 7ae24cd8-154c-9f36-ba61-f250f2c28da6@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 6/14/21 12:33 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> The line in lmgr.c is where the process title gets changed to "waiting".
> I recently stopped setting process title on this animal on REL_13_STABLE
> and its similar errors have largely gone away. I can do the same on
> HEAD. But it does make me wonder what the heck has changed to make this
> code fragile.

Of course I meant the line (1831) in lock.c.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-06-14 16:46:34 Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination
Previous Message Noah Misch 2021-06-14 16:40:27 Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination