| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROVE_FLAGS |
| Date: | 2017-06-09 20:47:11 |
| Message-ID: | 7ac69e85-e2d3-3618-d995-67d502f8a88e@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/5/17 15:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> In that case we're going to need to invent a way to do this similarly
>> in vcregress.pl. I'm not simply going to revert to the situation where
>> it and the makefiles are completely out of sync on this. The previous
>> patch was made more or less by ignoring the existence of vcregress.pl.
>>
>> I will look at this again probably after pgcon. I don't think it's
>> terribly urgent.
>>
>
>
> Here's a patch that should do that.
I'm not able to test this, but it looks like a reasonable approach.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-06-09 21:06:40 | logical replication NOTICE "synchronized table states" |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-09 20:31:55 | Re: logical replication busy-waiting on a lock |