Re: Add "password_protocol" connection parameter to libpq

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add "password_protocol" connection parameter to libpq
Date: 2019-08-11 17:00:54
Message-ID: 7a7a2f07-d013-eb80-85ba-9edaaf845038@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-08-09 23:56, Jeff Davis wrote:
> 1. Hierarchical semantics, where you specify the least-secure
> acceptable method:
>
> password_protocol = {any,md5,scram-sha-256,scram-sha-256-plus}

What would the hierarchy be if scram-sha-512 and scram-sha-512-plus are
added?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-08-11 19:12:44 Re: Undocumented PQdisplayTuples and PQprintTuples in libpq
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2019-08-11 08:00:00 Re: Fix typos and inconsistencies for HEAD (take 10)