| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64 |
| Date: | 2017-05-18 19:14:18 |
| Message-ID: | 7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e183@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/18/17 10:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that's just wacko. Somehow sequence.c's init_params() must
> be falling down on the job in selecting the right seqform->seqmin,
> but I'm darned if I see anything that's either wrong or potentially
> machine-dependent in that code. It almost looks like it must be
> a compiler bug, though I hesitate to jump to that conclusion so
> quickly. Peter, any ideas?
If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
caught it by now.
I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-18 19:21:44 | different column orders in regression test database |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-18 18:48:11 | Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64 |