Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Date: 2017-05-18 19:14:18
Message-ID: 7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e183@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/18/17 10:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that's just wacko. Somehow sequence.c's init_params() must
> be falling down on the job in selecting the right seqform->seqmin,
> but I'm darned if I see anything that's either wrong or potentially
> machine-dependent in that code. It almost looks like it must be
> a compiler bug, though I hesitate to jump to that conclusion so
> quickly. Peter, any ideas?

If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
caught it by now.

I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-18 19:21:44 different column orders in regression test database
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-05-18 18:48:11 Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64