| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>,Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>,Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>,Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
| Date: | 2019-08-21 17:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 7FB4C9CE-E35D-4240-9CD9-448AF70D3ECE@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On August 21, 2019 8:36:34 AM PDT, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We treat LWLockAcquire() as a no-fail operation in many
>places; in my opinion, that elog(ERROR) that we have for too many
>LWLocks should be changed to elog(PANIC) precisely because we do treat
>LWLockAcquire() as no-fail in lots of places in the code, but I think
>I suggested that once and got slapped down, and I haven't had the
>energy to fight about it.
Fwiw, that proposal has my vote.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2019-08-21 18:04:08 | Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps |
| Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2019-08-21 17:19:38 | Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |