| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jonas(dot)rosenthal(at)protechninjas(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 5.12.2.1. Example |
| Date: | 2026-10-23 08:44:55 |
| Message-ID: | 7E53F07A-2953-4F6A-871E-1A7B0A8A7042@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 23 Oct 2026, at 10:33, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 at 21:12, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> This page contains many examples, please specify which it is you find
>> problematic and paste the error message from postgres.
>
> Let's wait and see, but I suspect it's the "...".
>
> Maybe those would be better as comments, something like?
>
> CREATE TABLE measurement_y2006m03 PARTITION OF measurement
> FOR VALUES FROM ('2006-03-01') TO ('2006-04-01');
>
> -- plus y2006m04 .. y2007m10 (abbreviation for brevity)
Or perhaps "-- repeated for y2006m04 .. y2007m10 (abbreviated for brevity)"
> CREATE TABLE measurement_y2007m11 PARTITION OF measurement
> FOR VALUES FROM ('2007-11-01') TO ('2007-12-01');
If someone copy pastes the entire block I fear that they think it's a complete
example, and when it isn't then perhaps getting a syntax error is better?
That being said, replacing "..." is a good idea regardless of being a comment
or not, your suggestion makes the docs more readable,
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-10-23 08:53:57 | Re: 5.12.2.1. Example |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2026-10-23 08:34:53 | Re: 5.12.2.1. Example |