| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Jim Van Fleet <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org,Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |
| Date: | 2017-11-06 15:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | 7DB71F8D-C821-48D2-8379-FDEDB1EA5051@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On November 6, 2017 7:30:49 AM PST, Jim Van Fleet <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote on 11/05/2017 03:40:15 PM:
>
>hammerdb, in this configuration, runs a variant of tpcc
Hard to believe that any of the changes here are relevant in that case - this is parallelism specific stuff. Whereas tpcc is oltp, right?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-06 15:36:38 | Schedule for migration to pglister |
| Previous Message | Jim Van Fleet | 2017-11-06 15:30:49 | Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |