Re: ORDER BY in prepared statements

From: Bryn Jeffries <bryn(dot)jeffries(at)sydney(dot)edu(dot)au>
To: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ORDER BY in prepared statements
Date: 2015-01-21 23:09:33
Message-ID: 7DAF466372B27747B8EA808BE5651FA57AD61B2C@ex-mbx-pro-01
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Paul Jungwirth wrote
> I'm not sure how to make a prepared statement that lets you name a
> column when you execute it. Maybe someone else can chime in if that's
> possible.

David J. responded
> You cannot. By definition parameters, in this context, are values - not
> identifiers.
> [...]
> In both situations there is no way for the planner to plan and cache a
> single query whose order by column varies. No matter what you do at best
> you can have a single plan for each explicit order by column that you wish
> to specify.

That's what I'd figured. The motivation to use prepared statements in
application layers is not so much having a single plan but more the
insulation from SQL injection. The intent of the given ORDER BY example was
to restricts inputs to valid identifiers rather than part of the query
expression.

Maybe what we need in ODBC libs and the like is a "protected
statement" that follows the same construction as a prepared statement but
additionally checks catalogs to validate identifiers.

Bryn

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2015-01-21 23:17:11 Re: ORDER BY in prepared statements
Previous Message Bryn Jeffries 2015-01-21 22:38:25 Re: ORDER BY in prepared statements