| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dewei Dai <daidewei1970(at)163(dot)com>, "li(dot)evan(dot)chao" <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq |
| Date: | 2026-03-19 09:45:07 |
| Message-ID: | 7DA91781-AA47-447A-BA6F-99FE7E83954E@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 19 Mar 2026, at 10:39, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm really late to the part, but I did not see it discussed elsewhere on
> a quick glance: Isn't pg_hosts.conf a really (too) generic name for this
> feature? I don't want to open a huge bikeshedding sub-thread, but was a
> more specific filename considered?
I don't recall any discussion on that, and I don't really see a problem off the
cuff. As it is a config file for defining hostnames and their config, in which
way do you feel its too generic and what would "claiming that name" for this
prevent (or how would it confuse)? Do you have any alternative suggestions?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-03-19 09:48:36 | Re: Feature freeze timezone change request |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2026-03-19 09:39:25 | Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq |