Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: rees(at)ddcom(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
Date: 2004-08-26 16:39:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Aug 24, 2004, at 7:21 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> I don't know exactly what kind of encodings you wish to use, but I
> think MULE_INTERNAL might help you. It's actually mixture of various
> encodings with encoding-prefix added to each letter.  For example if
> you can mix KS5601 (Korean) and Japanese Kanji (JIS X0208) in a *same*
> column. So if you don't have problem with sorting KS5601/JIS X0208
> with C locale, you should not have problem with MULE_INTERNAL too in
> theory.

MULE_INTERNAL? Is that a locale?

> Remaining problem is how to display the Korean-Japanese mixed string
> in your client, but this is not PostgreSQL's problem, of
> course. However you could write your own conversion function
> MULE_INTERNAL <--> UTF-8, and might be able to solve the problem.

Well, the strings aren't usually mixed, but there can be different 
languages in different rows. For example, I have a customer with a 
single Bricolage instance in which they manage content in all of the 
following languages:


And they might do a search that returns results in more than one of 
these languages.



In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-08-26 16:41:07
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
Previous:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-08-26 16:36:20
Subject: Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group