Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Date: 2023-08-30 08:57:10
Message-ID: 7BE59586-7390-4906-B5D9-F83681093A8F@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 28 Aug 2023, at 14:32, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> Attached is a patch with a quick PoC for using PQPing instead of using psql for
> connection checks in pg_regress.

The attached v2 fixes a silly mistake which led to a compiler warning.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Speed-up-pg_regress-server-testing.patch application/octet-stream 10.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-30 09:03:58 Re: Is pg_regress --use-existing used by anyone or is it broken?
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2023-08-30 08:50:57 Re: Test case for parameterized remote path in postgres_fdw