Re: Prepared statements and suboptimal plans

From: Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prepared statements and suboptimal plans
Date: 2011-09-21 00:42:41
Message-ID: 7B0A863F-F304-4057-807B-9B2E6137E107@petdance.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Sep 20, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> 9.2, sorry, not 9.1. We could use some motivated people testing that
> aspect of GIT HEAD, though, since I doubt the policy for when to re-plan
> is quite ideal yet.

Is motivation and a box enough? I have motivation, but not knowledge of internals enough to drive testing myself.

xoa

--
Andy Lester => andy(at)petdance(dot)com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-09-21 01:00:32 Re: Prepared statements and suboptimal plans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-21 00:36:35 Re: Prepared statements and suboptimal plans