Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tony(dot)zhu(at)ww-it(dot)cn
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-12-17 03:06:15
Message-ID: 7A9F1670-3374-486B-8FA6-DB837B51757F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

HI all

I added comments and refactored part of the implementation in Storage_gtt.c.
I hope this will help Reviewer.

Wenjing

> 2020年12月9日 17:07,Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> 写道:
>
>
>
> st 9. 12. 2020 v 7:34 odesílatel 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com <mailto:wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>> napsal:
>
>
>> 2020年12月8日 13:28,Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>> 写道:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> čt 26. 11. 2020 v 12:46 odesílatel 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com <mailto:wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>> napsal:
>> This is the latest patch for feature GTT(v38).
>> Everybody, if you have any questions, please let me know.
>>
>> please, co you send a rebased patch. It is broken again
>
> Sure
>
> This patch is base on 16c302f51235eaec05a1f85a11c1df04ef3a6785
> Simplify code for getting a unicode codepoint's canonical class.
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Pavel
>
> Wenjing
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>> Wenjing
>>
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-12-17 03:32:32 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-12-17 02:04:33 STANDBY_LOCK_TIMEOUT may not interrupt ProcWaitForSignal()?