Re: Options for protocol level cursors

From: James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Options for protocol level cursors
Date: 2008-06-14 00:59:13
Message-ID: 7A5AD0FE-F755-430E-8040-A32A93207E47@jwp.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 13, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Kris Jurka wrote:
> The JDBC driver would also like this ability, but a GUC is a pretty
> ugly hack.

I completely agree that it is an ugly hack. :)

> Also, since you still have to go to the SQL level to issue the MOVE
> or FETCH BACKWARD, you're still not all the way there to a full
> protocol solution.

Completely true. However, this is, of course, only pertinent to SCROLL
cursors.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-06-14 02:38:18 Re: TODO Item: Allow pg_hba.conf to specify host names along with IP addresses
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2008-06-13 23:40:41 Re: Options for protocol level cursors