Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date: 2010-11-14 16:08:13
Message-ID: 7A412D2E-3784-4463-A42A-BF599F794270@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Nov 14, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I still think it's worth looking into whether the bug can be dodged
> by shortening the eval calls. But if not, I think I'd vote for
> reverting. Maybe we could revisit this in a couple of years.

+1. The current master branch fails to build on my (rather new) Mac with make -j2. I could upgrade my toolchain but it seems like more trouble than it's worth, not to mention a possible obstacle to new users and developers.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-14 16:08:18 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-14 15:44:23 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-14 16:08:18 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-14 16:06:51 Re: POSIX shared memory redux