Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?
Date: 2017-04-17 18:09:54
Message-ID: 79aea357-dba6-9a67-b1e3-ac729754da68@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/16/17 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this. Discussion is
ongoing. I'll report back on Wednesday.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-17 18:19:00 Re: Self-signed certificate instructions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2017-04-17 18:04:26 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.