Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Benjamin Arai <me(at)benjaminarai(dot)com>
Cc: Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta(at)wp(dot)pl>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware
Date: 2007-03-20 18:08:23
Message-ID: 79E11CC3-F3F2-477E-858B-94370753A7B9@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On 20-Mar-07, at 1:53 PM, Benjamin Arai wrote:

> This is a little biased but I would stay away from areca only
> because they have fans on the card. At some point down the line
> that card is going to die. When it does there is really no telling
> what it will do to your data. I personally use 3Ware cards, they
> work well but I have had one die before (1/10).
>
Well, they are also the only one of the bunch that I am aware of that
will sell you 1G of cache. Plus if you use battery backup sooner or
later you have to replace the batteries. I use areca all the time
and I've never had a fan die, but I admit it is a point of failure.

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2007-03-20 18:44:06 Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2007-03-20 17:01:40 Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware