| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Date: | 2010-04-20 23:53:36 |
| Message-ID: | 7978.1271807616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Current logic says we hit the connection limit if:
> if (!am_superuser &&
> ReservedBackends > 0 &&
> !HaveNFreeProcs(ReservedBackends))
> Couldn't we just change this to:
> if ((!am_superuser || am_walsender) &&
> ReservedBackends > 0 &&
> !HaveNFreeProcs(ReservedBackends))
As of the patch I just committed, that code is not reached anymore by a
walsender process. However, it shouldn't be hard to put a similar test
into the walsender code path.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-21 01:40:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2010-04-20 23:34:00 | Inconsistency in docs for OVERLAPS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-21 01:03:53 | Re: Move tablespace |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-20 23:49:24 | Re: Should database = all in pg_hba.conf match a replication connection? |