Re: Questions on printtup()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions on printtup()
Date: 2006-01-06 00:42:41
Message-ID: 7968.1136508161@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> So we spend a portion of time at preparing tuples in printtup() by
> converting the tuple format to a network format. I am not quite familiar
> with that part, so I wonder is it possible to try to send with original
> tuple format with minimal preparing job (say handling toast) -- which
> might increase the amount of data of network communication, but may reduce
> the CPU on server side?

It's called retrieving in binary format ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-06 01:01:23 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-01-05 23:24:27 Warm-up cache may have its virtue