Re: Are we missing a dot in initdb's output?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are we missing a dot in initdb's output?
Date: 2022-01-05 18:56:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> writes:
> initdb: warning: enabling "trust" authentication for local connections
> You can change this by editing pg_hba.conf or using the option -A, or
> --auth-local and --auth-host, the next time you run initdb.

> Shouldn't there be a "." after "authentication for local connections"?

Meh, I think this is mimicking our coding style for primary vs. detail

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dag Lem 2022-01-05 20:08:54 Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-01-05 18:54:49 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: PQcancel does not use tcp_user_timeout, connect_timeout and keepalive settings