From: | AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: timestamptz alias |
Date: | 2006-10-02 22:22:39 |
Message-ID: | 794403F6-6CB5-4726-806C-5EF76D64C7E3@themactionfaction.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 2, 2006, at 18:15 , Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm happy that the rather verbose "timestamp with time zone" has the
> much nicer alias "timestamptz", however it seems that this alias is
> not
> documented, neither at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html
> nor at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/datatype-
> datetime.html
>
> I see it mentioned at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/datatype.html but
> that's
> possibly not where people look at first, when they search for the
> timestamp type. (At least I found it only when grepping for
> "timestamptz" in the docs. :-)
>
> Should the alias be mentioned on the datetime page? The same for
> timetz?
> What do you think?
I am pleased that the documentation promotes database-independent
("standard") SQL.
-M
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-02 22:29:31 | Re: Broken link in PG docs |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-10-02 22:15:44 | timestamptz alias |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-02 22:28:23 | Re: NULL and plpgsql rows |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-10-02 22:21:37 | Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions |