Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2
Date: 1999-10-02 17:47:11
Message-ID: 7939.938886431@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> writes:
>> Yes, we should not be assuming that finite() is a macro, which is what
>> that #ifdef coding does. We need a HAVE_FINITE configuration test.
>> If you have time to prepare the diffs it'd be great.

> Here they are

Checked, applied to current. Thanks.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-02 18:19:38 Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-02 15:49:20 Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch